FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced July 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T305
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the FujiFilm T300 and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the T300 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T300 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the T300 matches up against the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T300 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm T300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Ricoh WG-70
| T300 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the FujiFilm T300
| WG-70 | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 104 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm T300 and Ricoh WG-70
| T300 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T300 features outer dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T300 and Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the T300 against the WG-70.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the T300 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the T300 and WG-70.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older T300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T300 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Also called as | FinePix T305 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $250 | $280 |