FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
FujiFilm XP10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-180mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 64 x 23mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix XP11
- Updated by Fujifilm XP30
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Photography Glossary FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Following is a complete review of the FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the XP10 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XP10 was revealed 24 months earlier than the TG-820 iHS making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XP10 grades vs the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix XP10 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm XP10 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm XP10 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| XP10 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the FujiFilm XP10
| TG-820 iHS | XP10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm XP10 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| XP10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm XP10 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 64mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XP10 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XP10 and TG-820 iHS is 95 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XP10 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs although you will want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged XP10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 Street photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography features
environment sealing
lighter than competition (135 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography information
lighter than competition (135 grams)
environment sealing
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f4.0)
environment proofing
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography factors
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f4.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm XP10 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging details
lighter than competition (135g)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f4.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm XP10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix XP10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix XP10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Also called | FinePix XP11 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/4.0-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 9cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 64 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $175 | $500 |