FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z707EXR
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the Z700EXR (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Z700EXR (1/2") and M320 (1/2.5") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z700EXR was revealed 13 months after the M320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z700EXR matches up versus the M320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR and Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z700EXR over the Kodak M320
| Z700EXR | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the FujiFilm Z700EXR
| M320 | Z700EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Kodak M320
| Z700EXR | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm Z700EXR offers exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Kodak M320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Z700EXR vs the M320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z700EXR and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z700EXR and M320.
All in all, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z700EXR having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the FujiFilm Z700EXR will offer extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent Z700EXR provides an edge in sensor technology.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix Z707EXR | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $39 |