Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus VG-110, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was revealed 12 months before the VG-110 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the 6020 grades versus the VG-110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus VG-110. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus VG-110
6020 | VG-110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus 6020
VG-110 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | February 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus VG-110
6020 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus VG-110 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the 6020 vs the VG-110.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and VG-110 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and VG-110.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus 6020 to provide more detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older 6020 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VG-110 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 105 grams (0.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $279 | $150 |