Clicky

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
19
Overall
29
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front
 
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs

FujiFilm Z800EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
  • 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
  • Released July 2010
  • Alternate Name is FinePix Z808EXR
Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Z800EXR was introduced 14 months before the Easyshare M5370 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm Z800EXR being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the Z800EXR grades versus the Easyshare M5370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 Z800EXR Easyshare M5370 
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR

 Easyshare M5370 Z800EXR 
ReleasedSeptember 2011July 2010Newer by 14 months

Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370

 Z800EXR Easyshare M5370 
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm Z800EXR provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Look at the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Z800EXR vs the Easyshare M5370.

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and Easyshare M5370 is 95 and 95 respectively.

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and Easyshare M5370.

As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z800EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
34
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR Street photography advice
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography advice
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
heavier than others (158g)
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with FujiFilm Z800EXR
Sports photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2")
does not have phase detect autofocus
29
resolution is good (16MP)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm Z800EXR
Travel photography with Kodak Easyshare M5370
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (158 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
72
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Easyshare M5370 as a Landscape photography camera
32
very good size screen (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
43
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm Z800EXR Vlogging highlights
Kodak Easyshare M5370 Vlogging highlights
27
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than others (158g)
32
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
supports face detection focus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370
 FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXRKodak Easyshare M5370
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Kodak
Model type FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR Kodak Easyshare M5370
Also called as FinePix Z808EXR -
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-07-21 2011-09-14
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Highest boosted ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-175mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-4.7 -
Macro focusing distance 9cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3.5" 3"
Resolution of display 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.90 m 3.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-1, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lbs) 150 gr (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-45A KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $200 $160