FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and Easyshare M5370 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Z800EXR was introduced 14 months before the Easyshare M5370 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm Z800EXR being a Ultracompact camera and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the Z800EXR grades versus the Easyshare M5370 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
Z800EXR | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
Easyshare M5370 | Z800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | July 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak Easyshare M5370
Z800EXR | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm Z800EXR provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Z800EXR vs the Easyshare M5370.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Z800EXR and Easyshare M5370 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and Easyshare M5370.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z800EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Also called as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-07-21 | 2011-09-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $200 | $160 |