FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
![FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR/FujiFilm-Z800EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung ST95 front Samsung ST95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST95/Samsung-ST95-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Let's look more closely at the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Z800EXR (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the Z800EXR (1/2") and ST95 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Z800EXR was unveiled 6 months prior to the ST95 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z800EXR scores versus the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung ST95
Z800EXR | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
ST95 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung ST95
Z800EXR | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2011 | Same generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has got outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Samsung ST95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Z800EXR against the ST95.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-ST95-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-ST95-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z800EXR and ST95.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Z800EXR with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung ST95 will produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-ST95-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z800EXR-vs-Samsung-ST95-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung ST95 |
Also referred to as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-07-21 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 9cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $200 | $145 |