FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d3c/a9d3cc5042100f00925cb4722dafdb90b1666e82" alt="FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce2e/7ce2ede9fa2768a825fe05b5a60a4314f7a7f1a8" alt="Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as PL100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Samsung TL205, both Ultracompact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is very close but the Z800EXR (1/2") and TL205 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Z800EXR was manufactured 7 months later than the TL205 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Z800EXR scores versus the TL205 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung TL205
Z800EXR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
TL205 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung TL205
Z800EXR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR provides outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm Z800EXR versus Samsung TL205 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the Z800EXR vs the TL205.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47166/47166b8c345138d5bfc142103d13c3b60631d9d0" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z800EXR and TL205 is 95 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e97f/1e97f1fa90292c52bb70084d12c7fd18987cbbf6" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Z800EXR and TL205.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor measurements. The Z800EXR offers the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more recent Z800EXR provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51479/5147978bfc824bd9a40bf728e58e28b72e481a2d" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77258/772583aacdcfbfe6978564a3258693eb33d3b448" alt="FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL205 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix Z808EXR | PL100 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-07-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 9cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $200 | $180 |