FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
FujiFilm Z800EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix Z808EXR
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is very comparable but the Z800EXR (1/2") and TL225 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z800EXR was introduced 12 months later than the TL225 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Z800EXR scores versus the TL225 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Samsung TL225
| Z800EXR | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| TL225 | Z800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung TL225
| Z800EXR | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm Z800EXR features exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Z800EXR and the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z800EXR and TL225 is 95 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z800EXR and TL225.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor measurements. The Z800EXR comes with the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more modern Z800EXR should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2")
has no RAW files
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Street photography info
Samsung TL225 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2")
has no RAW files
more heavy than average (158 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (187 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Sports photography factors
Samsung TL225 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2")
has no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Travel photography info
Samsung TL225 Travel photography info
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (158 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
boasts focus by touch
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (187g)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Landscape photography information
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography information
big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
decently wide (27mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL225 Vlogging highlights
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than average (158 grams)
decently wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (187g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called | FinePix Z808EXR | ST550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-07-21 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 187 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $200 | $488 |