Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b28/d8b28647471b03fc834a4cadf7355ed9014372e0" alt="Fujifilm FinePix A150 front Fujifilm FinePix A150 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 130g - 92 x 61 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm A150 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm A150 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm A150 was announced within a month of the SL202 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm A150 scores against the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix A150 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm A150 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm A150 over the Samsung SL202
Fujifilm A150 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm A150
SL202 | Fujifilm A150 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm A150 and Samsung SL202
Fujifilm A150 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm A150 comes with exterior measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm A150 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm A150 compared to the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e8c/b7e8cfa5ac8eb3a6bc08d72386c30a00a84a2438" alt="Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm A150 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a97/81a97e079b3a9cb9060aa3437a5f695a082e93e1" alt="Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm A150 and SL202.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you really should factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad110/ad110d7720dd099c9e9c5369f6c8d7fba38203ff" alt="Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cca0/6cca05f4395c8e68516eae136a5681a67e27e364" alt="Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm A150 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix A150 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix A150 | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-02-04 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $140 |