Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and Z950 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 13 months prior to the Z950 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm F200EXR | Z950 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| Z950 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm F200EXR | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has specifications of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the Z950.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Z950.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers the bigger sensor which should make getting bokeh simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 1/8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1250s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 243 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $350 | $250 |