Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
91 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Nikon S9300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9100, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the S9100 (12MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and S9100 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 3 years before the S9100 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the S9100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9100. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Nikon S9100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Nikon S9100
| Fujifilm F200EXR | S9100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| S9100 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | April 2009 | More modern by 27 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9100
| Fujifilm F200EXR | S9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR has physical measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S9100 has proportions of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon S9100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the S9100.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and S9100 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and S9100.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR contains the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon S9100 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 270 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $350 | $329 |