Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9207c/9207c00abb1a3f512690da028260fac624b4f599" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c093a/c093ae2117bb68c7c1561b0f622d9b6a9250e7ec" alt="Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus SZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and SZ-10 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm F200EXR was introduced 21 months earlier than the SZ-10 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the SZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus SZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus SZ-10
Fujifilm F200EXR | SZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
SZ-10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 21 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus SZ-10
Fujifilm F200EXR | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR features exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-10 has specifications of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Olympus SZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the SZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c96a7/c96a77b42f6572b506c0ac4957b29188cac855cd" alt="Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and SZ-10 is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2239a/2239ad186131626cb1d812507add554915f11b4a" alt="Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and SZ-10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus SZ-10 will offer extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb3ac/cb3aca650dff9db5b68fab274c7ec93bbe4714c5" alt="Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb8b7/fb8b7265c426143b978fdc7ae499c15b33a0dd8e" alt="Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus SZ-10 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-04-30 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 215 gr (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $350 | $300 |