Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was brought out 8 months earlier than the Tough-3000 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm F200EXR | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| Tough-3000 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm F200EXR | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR features exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the Tough-3000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The picture underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Tough-3000.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR features the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $350 | $0 |