Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31


94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

The Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 3 years before the TG-320 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-320
Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
TG-320 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320
Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the TG-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-320 will give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-04-30 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $350 | $0 |