Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Released April 2009
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

The following is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 3 years before the TG-320 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm F200EXR TG-320 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 TG-320 Fujifilm F200EXR 
IntroducedJanuary 2012April 2009Newer by 32 months

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm F200EXR TG-320 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides physical dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the TG-320.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The pic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-320.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-320 will give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW support
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
supports face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW support
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than others (155 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
28
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (150 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography features
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography features
57
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
67
lighter than others (155g)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery (150 shots)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
38
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.6")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery (150 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging features
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging features
28
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than others (155 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXROlympus TG-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus TG-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-04-30 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 155g (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $350 $0