Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ8
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic ZS5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and ZS5 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and ZS5 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 7 years later than the ZS5 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS5 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the ZS5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic ZS5
E-M10 III | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | June 2010 | More recent by 88 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Olympus E-M10 III
ZS5 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic ZS5
E-M10 III | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS5 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic ZS5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III vs the ZS5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and ZS5 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and ZS5.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $650 | $300 |