Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 5 years before the TG-2 iHS which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-2 iHS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR comes with outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-2 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field easier. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $350 | $380 |