Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fae1/5fae1faea13ce3a1b1ebe9819f9535c6ec0ad1d7" alt="Olympus SP-610UZ front Olympus SP-610UZ front"
79 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Announced January 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-620 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus SP-610UZ, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and SP-610UZ (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and SP-610UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-420 was launched 3 years before the SP-610UZ which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-610UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-420 matches up vs the SP-610UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Olympus SP-610UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus SP-610UZ
E-420 | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-610UZ over the Olympus E-420
SP-610UZ | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 30 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus SP-610UZ
E-420 | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus SP-610UZ has specifications of 107mm x 73mm x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") with a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus SP-610UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-420 versus the SP-610UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbcc0/cbcc096e01626a95bf9b079cc23228a07df0ccf6" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and SP-610UZ is 77 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fa63/5fa633c1aad855b74d3a456868af208278f6230f" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and SP-610UZ.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-420 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SP-610UZ will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48daf/48daf9f8d1c46b2138ea5331b1fd1df6dcc2a4a8" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b43f/0b43f3805dc9a196ea0a9bf40dd7387fe2408c6f" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-610UZ Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus SP-610UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus SP-610UZ |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-616mm (22.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 405 gr (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $999 | $299 |