Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-4 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 7 years before the TG-4 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TG-4 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 | April 2009 | More recent by 72 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR features outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the TG-4.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-4.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $379 |