Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Introduced April 2009
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Released April 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
  • New Model is Olympus TG-5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and TG-4 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 7 years before the TG-4 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR scores vs the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Olympus TG-4

 Fujifilm F200EXR TG-4 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 TG-4 Fujifilm F200EXR 
ReleasedApril 2015April 2009More recent by 72 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-4

 Fujifilm F200EXR TG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR features outside measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus the TG-4.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and TG-4.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
21
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
no RAW format
46
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography features
Olympus TG-4 Street photography features
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
no RAW format
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than average (247g)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm F200EXR
Sports photography with Olympus TG-4
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
no phase detect AF
47
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
good battery power (380 per charge)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography factors
57
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
74
good battery power (380 CIPA)
environment sealing
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average (247 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
38
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.6")
no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
62
manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
good battery power (380 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging factors
28
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone socket
34
relatively wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
heavier than average (247g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Olympus TG-4
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXROlympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus Tough TG-4
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2009-04-30 2015-04-13
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 247g (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $350 $379