Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 7030 was introduced 7 years before the SH-3 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the 7030 grades against the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7030 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 7030 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Olympus SH-3
| 7030 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus 7030
| SH-3 | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 74 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Olympus SH-3
| 7030 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 7030 enjoys exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the 7030 versus the SH-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 7030 and SH-3 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 7030 and SH-3.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus SH-3 to deliver more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older 7030 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 7030 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7030 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Also referred to as | mju 7030 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $179 | $579 |