Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and CX3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 13 months before the CX3 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| CX3 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 | April 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm F200EXR | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR enjoys outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the CX3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX3 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and CX3.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F200EXR will deliver more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $350 | $329 |