Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and PX (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F200EXR was announced 3 years prior to the PX which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the PX in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm F200EXR | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| PX | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2011 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 27 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm F200EXR | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the PX.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and PX is 93 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F200EXR and PX.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh PX will provide more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh PX |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-04-30 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 156 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $350 | $329 |