Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-330 was released 10 years prior to the E-M10 II and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-330 matches up versus the E-M10 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-330 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-330
E-M10 II | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | March 2006 | Fresher by 114 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper display (+825k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M10 II
E-330 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 vs the E-M10 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-M10 II is 65 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and E-M10 II.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M10 II to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2006-03-18 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 390 gr (0.86 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $499 |