Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Released April 2009
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 5 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm F200EXR WG-4 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 WG-4 GPS Fujifilm F200EXR 
ReleasedFebruary 2014April 2009More modern by 58 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm F200EXR WG-4 GPS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outside dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4 GPS.

As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography information
21
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW format
41
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography highlights
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW format
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (235g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
28
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.6")
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
69
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery power (240 CIPA)
more heavy than competition (235g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
38
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.6")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic jack
34
pretty wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition (235 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRRicoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-04-30 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.1 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 gr (0.45 pounds) 235 gr (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $350 $210