Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was unveiled 5 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades versus the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | April 2009 | More modern by 58 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm F200EXR | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR provides outside dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-04-30 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $210 |