Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and WB800F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm F200EXR was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| WB800F | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F200EXR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers exterior dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR against the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F200EXR and WB800F.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung WB800F will show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $300 |