Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Announced April 2009
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Overview

The following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 7 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm F200EXR Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm F200EXR

 Quattro Fujifilm F200EXR 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016April 2009Newer by 83 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen resolution1620k230kCrisper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm F200EXR Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the Quattro.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro.

As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will deliver more detail because of its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Portrait photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography highlights
21
no manual focus
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
no RAW support
80
focusing manually
megapixel count high (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Street photography information
Sigma Quattro Street photography information
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
no RAW support
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Sports photography factors
Sigma Quattro Sports photography factors
28
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
no phase detect autofocus
69
megapixel count high (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR as a Travel photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Travel photography camera
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
54
environment sealing
megapixel count high (29MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (625g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Landscape photography features
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography features
38
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.6")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
72
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count high (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR Vlogging advice
Sigma Quattro Vlogging advice
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
22
comes with face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution ( pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Sigma sd Quattro
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2009-04-30 2016-02-23
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.6" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 29MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.3-5.1 -
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 4.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/1500s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.8 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.30 m (Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 -
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $350 $738