Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31


63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 7 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR grades against the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm F200EXR | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm F200EXR
Quattro | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 83 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm F200EXR | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the Quattro.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Quattro.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F200EXR having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will deliver more detail because of its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-04-30 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-50 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $350 | $738 |