Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950
91 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Released June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F500 EXR (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F500 EXR (1/2") and Z950 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm F500 EXR was manufactured 7 months later than the Z950 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm F500 EXR matches up vs the Z950 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F500 EXR Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F500 EXR over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm F500 EXR | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm F500 EXR
| Z950 | Fujifilm F500 EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm F500 EXR | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F500 EXR has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F500 EXR and the Z950.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F500 EXR and Z950 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F500 EXR and Z950.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F500 EXR due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Fujifilm F500 EXR will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F500 EXR will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $430 | $250 |