Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
99 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both are built by Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and ST6500 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was announced 24 months prior to the ST6500 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SL102 scores against the ST6500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL102 & Samsung ST6500. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung ST6500
| SL102 | ST6500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Samsung SL102
| ST6500 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung ST6500
| SL102 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung SL102 offers outer dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has specifications of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the SL102 against the ST6500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL102 and ST6500 is 96 and 99 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SL102 and ST6500.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST6500 to render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged SL102 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung ST6500 |
| Also called as | ES55 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 grams (0.26 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | - |
