Clicky

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Fujifilm F750EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Announced January 2012
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Let's look closer at the Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm F750EXR was released 13 months later than the TG-310 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm F750EXR matches up versus the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Olympus TG-310

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F750EXR TG-310 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2011Fresher by 13 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm F750EXR

		

		

			
 TG-310 Fujifilm F750EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-310

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F750EXR TG-310 
Manually focus  No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Missing Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F750EXR provides outside dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F750EXR vs the TG-310.
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F750EXR and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F750EXR and TG-310.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F750EXR due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F750EXR will produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F750EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm F750EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
36
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 features face detect focus
 focusing manually not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 doesn't have RAW support
33
 good MP (14MP)
 provides face detect focusing
 manual focus not available
 no manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Street photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Street photography advice
61
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (234 grams)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 doesn't have RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proofing
 lighter than others (155g)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography factors
52
 incredible zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 features tracking focus
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 environment proofing
 max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 bad battery life (150 per charge)
 lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Travel photography information
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography information
68
 lighter than competition (234 grams)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 very long reach (500mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than others (155g)
 environment proofing
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (28mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 bad battery life (150 CIPA)
 does not contain selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography advice
44
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 focusing manually not possible
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 doesn't have RAW support
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
39
 fairly wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14MP)
 environment proofing
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 no manual mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 bad battery life (150 shots)
 does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F750EXR
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
34
 reasonably wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detect focus
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition (234 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have mic jack
32
 fairly wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect focusing
 lighter than others (155g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 does not contain selfie friendly display
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 does not have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	

		

			
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F750EXR and Olympus TG-310
 Fujifilm FinePix F750EXROlympus TG-310
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR Olympus TG-310
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2012-01-05 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR TruePic III+
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 11.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 234 gr (0.52 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $445 $0