Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Fujifilm F750EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm F750EXR and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F750EXR was released 12 months prior to the WB800F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm F750EXR matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F750EXR | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm F750EXR
| WB800F | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F750EXR and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm F750EXR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm F750EXR comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F750EXR and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F750EXR vs the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F750EXR and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F750EXR and WB800F.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F750EXR uses the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The older Fujifilm F750EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography advice
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2")
no RAW format
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (234 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2")
no RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Sports photography features
Samsung WB800F Sports photography features
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2")
no phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR Travel photography information
Samsung WB800F Travel photography information
lighter than average (234 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (218g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F750EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
relatively wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F750EXR
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (234g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no mic jack
relatively wide (23mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F750EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 234 gr (0.52 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $445 | $300 |