Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Announced July 2010
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and Z981 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm F800EXR was manufactured 2 years after the Z981 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm F800EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR scores against the Z981 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Kodak EasyShare Z981. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Kodak Z981
Fujifilm F800EXR | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | July 2010 | Newer by 25 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
Z981 | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Kodak Z981
Fujifilm F800EXR | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F800EXR features external dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Kodak Z981 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR compared to the Z981.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F800EXR and Z981 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Z981.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F800EXR should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-07-25 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 6.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 540g (1.19 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $330 | $299 |