Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced July 2012
- Old Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm F900EXR
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Fujifilm F800EXR and Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Panasonic. The resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and ZS35 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm F800EXR was unveiled 17 months before the ZS35 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades vs the ZS35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm F800EXR | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
| ZS35 | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | July 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm F800EXR | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR has got external dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F800EXR and Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR versus the ZS35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F800EXR and ZS35 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F800EXR and ZS35.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F800EXR includes the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F800EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Portrait photography features
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography features
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2")
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Street photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2")
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Sports photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2")
lacks phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
does not have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F800EXR Landscape photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography info
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
saves RAW files
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2")
doesn't have Timelapse function
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F800EXR
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 41 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $330 | $300 |
