Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Old Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- New Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was released 2 years after the HZ35W which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung HZ35W
Fujifilm F800EXR | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Fujifilm F800EXR
HZ35W | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung HZ35W
Fujifilm F800EXR | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F800EXR has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the HZ35W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F800EXR should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $330 | $300 |