Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21920/21920fb575574528cb80322541ad6d24db4090a9" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Refreshed by Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very close but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and WB150F (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm F800EXR was brought out 7 months later than the WB150F and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up against the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung WB150F
Fujifilm F800EXR | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Fujifilm F800EXR
WB150F | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung WB150F
Fujifilm F800EXR | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm F800EXR has got outside measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR and the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cf76/8cf766f21ea1a6c1d0d02499a720b4dc88a82f4c" alt="Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eee6/1eee66f2a85ca5040b913071aeb182ed6677b5e5" alt="Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The photograph here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F800EXR and WB150F.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F800EXR featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F800EXR will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08222/08222b8943c9e09e65faa139a5097683af56e409" alt="Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6048a/6048a563c30130d8265fec72dc4dc898664bed4b" alt="Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung WB150F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-07-25 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $330 | $230 |