Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as EasyShare Max

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and Z990 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 2 years later than the Z990 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the Z990 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Kodak Z990
Fujifilm F900EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 26 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
Z990 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Kodak Z990
Fujifilm F900EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Z990 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the Z990.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Z990 is 90 and 68 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Z990.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Also called | - | EasyShare Max |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 8.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $380 | $299 |