Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z990 front
Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Kodak Z990
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Released January 2011
  • Also Known as EasyShare Max
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and Z990 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 2 years later than the Z990 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores vs the Z990 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Kodak Z990

 Fujifilm F900EXR Z990 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2011More recent by 26 months
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 Z990 Fujifilm F900EXR 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Kodak Z990

 Fujifilm F900EXR Z990 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Z990 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the Z990.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Z990 is 90 and 68 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Z990.

As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography information
Kodak Z990 Portrait photography information
44
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2")
41
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography features
Kodak Z990 Street photography features
68
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than others in class (232g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2")
54
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Z990 as a Sports photography camera
55
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
sensor size is very small (1/2")
low battery pack (260 CIPA)
34
excellent zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Z990 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
low battery pack (260 shots)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
51
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long zoom (840mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Kodak Z990
47
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
low battery pack (260 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
45
you can focus manually
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging details
Kodak Z990 Vlogging details
34
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no external microphone jack
28
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Kodak Z990 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Kodak Z990
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXRKodak EasyShare Z990
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Kodak
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Kodak EasyShare Z990
Also called - EasyShare Max
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-30 2011-01-04
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 8.90 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 445 gr (0.98 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $380 $299