Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Announced January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 8000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and 8000 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released 3 years later than the 8000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up versus the 8000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus 8000
Fujifilm F900EXR | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
8000 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 8000
Fujifilm F900EXR | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus 8000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the 8000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and 8000 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and 8000.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 182g (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $380 |