Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released 12 months later than the TG-820 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up against the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-820 iHS 
RevealedJanuary 2013February 2012Fresher by 12 months

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 TG-820 iHS Fujifilm F900EXR 
Display resolution1030k920kCrisper display (+110k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys outside dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the TG-820 iHS.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-820 iHS.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
44
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2")
27
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography info
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2")
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography features
55
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
sensor has phase detect AF
small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 per charge)
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
66
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
not so great battery power (260 per charge)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
59
environment proof
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
47
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
38
relatively wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery (220 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging factors
34
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (232 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no microphone support
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2013-01-30 2012-02-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR II TruePic VI
Sensor type EXRCMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lb) 206 gr (0.45 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 pictures 220 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $380 $500