Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm F900EXR was released 12 months later than the TG-820 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up against the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR
TG-820 iHS | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 920k | Crisper display (+110k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS
Fujifilm F900EXR | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys outside dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR II | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $380 | $500 |