Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
55
Overall
45
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
36
Features
67
Overall
48

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Announced January 2013
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm F900EXR was announced 2 months later than the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades against the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 Fujifilm F900EXR XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 XZ-2 iHS Fujifilm F900EXR 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 Fujifilm F900EXR XZ-2 iHS 
IntroducedJanuary 2013December 2012Same generation
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Display resolution920k920kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR has external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and XZ-2 iHS.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Fujifilm F900EXR will produce greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
43
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
exports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2")
45
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
68
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2")
65
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
55
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
very small sensor (1/2")
terrible battery power (260 CIPA)
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (340 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
66
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery power (260 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
61
great battery power (340 CIPA)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
47
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2")
terrible battery power (260 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
54
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (340 per charge)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
34
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
36
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone jack
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition in class (346g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-30 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 11.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 346 grams (0.76 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life 260 pictures 340 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $380 $450