Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ95
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS70
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Panasonic ZS80, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the ZS80 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and ZS80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm F900EXR was unveiled 6 years prior to the ZS80 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the ZS80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Panasonic ZS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Panasonic ZS80
Fujifilm F900EXR | ZS80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
ZS80 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 61 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Panasonic ZS80
Fujifilm F900EXR | ZS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR features physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS80 has measurements of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") and a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F900EXR and Panasonic ZS80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR and the ZS80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and ZS80 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The picture here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and ZS80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS80 will provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Panasonic ZS80 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ95 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2018-02-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR II | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 327g (0.72 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | 380 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $448 |