Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and SL202 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was launched 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up versus the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| SL202 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm F900EXR | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the SL202.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and SL202.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm F900EXR will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $380 | $140 |