Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Announced September 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WB750 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 18 months after the WB750 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades versus the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung WB750

 Fujifilm F900EXR WB750 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013September 2011More modern by 18 months
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

 WB750 Fujifilm F900EXR 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB750

 Fujifilm F900EXR WB750 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got exterior measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the WB750.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB750.

Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will show extra detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography factors
44
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW files
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2")
41
focusing manually
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography highlights
Samsung WB750 Street photography highlights
68
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competitors (232 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2")
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Sports photography camera
55
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
sensor is very small (1/2")
bad battery (260 CIPA)
51
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (13MP)
features tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB750 Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competitors (232 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse recording
bad battery (260 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition in class (193g)
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Samsung WB750
47
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
saves RAW files
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is very small (1/2")
bad battery (260 shots)
no Timelapse recording
48
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (13MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Samsung WB750
34
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (232g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
34
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (193 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB750
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXRSamsung WB750
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Samsung WB750
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-30 2011-09-01
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4096 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 11.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 3.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 pounds) 193 gr (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $380 $339