Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
![Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR/Fujifilm-F900EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB750 front Samsung WB750 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB750.jpg)
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WB750 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F900EXR was brought out 18 months after the WB750 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades versus the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung WB750
Fujifilm F900EXR | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
WB750 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB750
Fujifilm F900EXR | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got exterior measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the WB750.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Samsung-WB750-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Samsung-WB750-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB750.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm F900EXR will show extra detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F900EXR should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Samsung-WB750-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F900EXR-vs-Samsung-WB750-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB750 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $380 | $339 |