Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Launched January 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Successor is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and VR-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm HS35EXR was announced 18 months later than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR matches up against the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm HS35EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
VR-320 | Fujifilm HS35EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm HS35EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS35EXR features physical measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") along with a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and VR-320 is 59 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm HS35EXR with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm HS35EXR will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm HS35EXR provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 687 gr (1.51 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 600 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $179 |