Clicky

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
57
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Older Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
  • Successor is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and VR-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm HS35EXR was announced 18 months later than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR matches up against the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm HS35EXR VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2011More recent by 18 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR

 VR-320 Fujifilm HS35EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm HS35EXR VR-320 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS35EXR features physical measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") along with a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus the VR-320.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and VR-320 is 59 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and VR-320.

As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm HS35EXR with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm HS35EXR will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm HS35EXR provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm HS35EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
56
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2")
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
55
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2")
more heavy than competition in class (687g)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Sports photography details
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
55
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (600 shots)
small sensor size (1/2")
lacks phase detect autofocus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
53
better than average battery power (600 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (687g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography details
53
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (600 shots)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
25
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (687g)
32
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXROlympus VR-320
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-720mm (30.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 687 gr (1.51 lb) 158 gr (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 600 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-W126 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $380 $179