Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102
54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52


96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Released January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55

Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR versus Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") and SL102 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm HS50 EXR was launched 4 years after the SL102 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm HS50 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm HS50 EXR grades versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS50 EXR over the Samsung SL102
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm HS50 EXR
SL102 | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Samsung SL102
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR has got physical measurements of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Fujifilm HS50 EXR versus Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and the SL102.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and SL102 is 54 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm HS50 EXR will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-07 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 808g (1.78 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $130 |