Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Kodak Z980, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and Z980 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm JZ200 was manufactured 3 years later than the Z980 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up vs the Z980 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm JZ200 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 201k | Sharper screen (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| Z980 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Kodak Z980
| Fujifilm JZ200 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm JZ200 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Kodak Z980 has dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Kodak Z980 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus the Z980.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JZ200 and Z980 is 95 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Z980.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm JZ200 to give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm JZ200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 201k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lbs) | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $249 |