Clicky

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
30
Overall
35
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Fujifilm JZ200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Launched March 2004
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
  • Successor is Sigma SD14
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm JZ200 and Sigma SD10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the Fujifilm JZ200 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm JZ200 was manufactured 7 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up vs the SD10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Sigma SD10

 Fujifilm JZ200 SD10 
LaunchedJanuary 2012March 2004More recent by 95 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k130kCrisper screen (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Fujifilm JZ200

 SD10 Fujifilm JZ200 
Manual focus More precise focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Sigma SD10

 Fujifilm JZ200 SD10 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm JZ200 has external dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm JZ200 and Sigma SD10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the SD10.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm JZ200 and SD10 is 95 and 54 respectively.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and SD10.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm JZ200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm JZ200 will deliver more detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm JZ200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 Portrait photography details
Sigma SD10 Portrait photography details
30
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
47
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (3MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 Street photography features
Sigma SD10 Street photography features
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (135g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
43
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than others (950g)
low max ISO (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 Sports photography features
Sigma SD10 Sports photography features
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
36
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000s)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Travel photography camera
68
lighter than competitors in class (135g)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
29
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (950g)
sensor resolution low (3 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 Landscape photography advice
Sigma SD10 Landscape photography advice
43
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
41
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
low max ISO (800)
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm JZ200
Vlogging with Sigma SD10
31
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (135 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm JZ200 and Sigma SD10
 Fujifilm FinePix JZ200Sigma SD10
General Information
Make FujiFilm Sigma
Model type Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 Sigma SD10
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2012-01-05 2004-03-19
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 3 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3216 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 1600 800
Highest boosted ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 25-200mm (8.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.9-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 1.8 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 130k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 2.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 135 grams (0.30 pounds) 950 grams (2.09 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-45A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $198