Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49e87/49e87370fa49dea2e26560662d9ff1039089e86f" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef422/ef422e5451b78a85db54621e12b18d4416f0a698" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front"
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview
Here is a complete review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S2000HD, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was unveiled 7 months later than the Fujifilm S2000HD which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades against the Fujifilm S2000HD in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Screen size | 2.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Fujifilm S2000HD | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S2000HD
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 provides physical measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S2000HD has proportions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S2000HD in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the Fujifilm S2000HD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93fd3/93fd3c6013a32966ad83169e9ba218f97c5d9ea6" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 90 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31b88/31b88de627527d890f3098c0b1170d4e930356e0" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S2000HD.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images although you might want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The fresher Fujifilm Real 3D W1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63eb9/63eb931f9891ae85470447cc223f69f2db92c71b" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a75c/3a75cd2937905fc583b736ed4c3642e89d4d3e76" alt="Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-414mm (14.8x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 8cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 pounds) | 426g (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $900 | $280 |