Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 7 months later than the SP-565UZ so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores vs the SP-565UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2009 | January 2009 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Screen dimension | 2.8" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| SP-565UZ | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 enjoys outside dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs the SP-565UZ.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and SP-565UZ is 90 and 72 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images although you will need to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.8 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260g (0.57 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $900 | $400 |