Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was released 6 months earlier than the 6020 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades versus the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| 6020 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 |  | February 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 features external measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs the 6020.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and 6020.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus 6020 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | RP (Real Photo) 3D | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260 grams (0.57 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $900 | $279 |