Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was introduced 17 months before the TG-310 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores versus the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.8" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| TG-310 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 features physical measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs the TG-310.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to resolve extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 260g (0.57 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-95 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $900 | $0 |