Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Ricoh CX3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 10 months prior to the CX3 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up against the CX3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| CX3 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the CX3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and CX3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of images although you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-95 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $900 | $329 |
