Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores vs the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.8" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 62 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has external dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WG-M1.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.8 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260g (0.57 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-95 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $900 | $2,000 |